grounds of Thought
seyedhasan
amin
.
author
text
article
2000
per
"Molana's" school ol mysticism (Erfan) is distinct from that of "Ehn-E Arahi". Merely proving That "Molvi" and "Ebn-E Arabi" had met in Damascus (when Molavi was young and Ebn-E Arabi old), the close friendly relations held between "Molavi" and "Sadr-E Ghoonavi" (The most cminct teacher anti preacher of Ebn-E Arabi's teachings), in "Ghoonie" (while they werboth old), or that they had certain opinions in common ,can not be takan as enough evidence proving "Molavi" 's being infivenced by "Ebn-E Arabi",far: l · Ehn-c Arabi and Molana had a short visit in Damascus. 2 - By the time, Molana met "Sadr-E-Ghoonavi" he had arcadly become a distinguished figure in Sufism.(Tasawol) 3 ·· After meeting "Shams-E-Tabrizi". Molana's path diverted from that of his antecedents (his father , "Bahaodin Ualad Soltan-E Balkhi",Borhan-E din Tarmazi , and the others)." Molana "employed simple language inorder to express the complicated issues on practical mysticism (Erfane Amali) and (Elme Baton), us.tally in the form of stories and fables. While "Ebn-E Arabi" , the founder of theoretical mysticism (Erfane Nazari), hadbcen in the same camp of Bahaodin Balkhi and Borhanodin Tarmazi, Whose book, , "shams" had foebidden him to real tor "Molana" to read. 4 - Contrary to Henry carbon's conclvsion claiming that Malama had been influenced by Ebn-E Arabi on the grounds that , "Masnavi" interpreters in Iran and India had reffered to Ebnc-Arabi for their intcrprerations, we have to say that, this only indicates the acccpicnce and favorable stance of Ebn-E Arabi's doctrines in Iran and India and not his in flucnce on "Molana". There is no evidence that "Molana" himself had used any of Ebn-E Arabi's concepts which had not been used by philosophers or mystics preceding him. On the basis of the above mentionde points, the clain that Molana had been under the influenced of Ebn-e Arabi proves wrong, as 11 Molana" belonged to the camp of "Shams" and his school of "sama" , "Raghs" and "Tasavo!" , while Ebn-E Arabi belonged to the camp of Islamic west and especially Andalusia.
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
1
30
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6215_691aa1e4c71c32749aee8c6275ab99a9.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6215
Lexical Evidence found ing the poems used in "Kashfol Asrar"
saeid
vaez
.
author
text
article
2000
per
The interpretation of "Kashfol Asrar and Oddatol Abrar" known as "Kwoj-E Abdillah-E. Ansari" 's interpretation, is considered to be the most magnificent and expressive mystical interpretation.which cmbclishs the persian literature. One stylistic charactristic of this work, contributed to the enhancement of its grace and beauty is its reference to some very glorious and delicate [Arabic and pcrsian poems. There arc about eight hundred couplets in this book, each excmpliling and analysing a specific category such as, Grammar, Lexis, Religion, Literature History, Language Nicitics, cts.]
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
31
55
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6216_b5bcef694f65f7960394b8ff0e81fc6f.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6216
Language as a prison
mohamadhasan
hasanzadeh
.
author
text
article
2000
per
Language is man's most important perceptive devices . Except for rare casos, language is the only means which leads to man's thoughts. Yet at times man's perception is so intricate, complicated and vast that language fails to reflect it, and that is where langugc which used tu release ones ideas from the prison his or mind will yet turnin to another prison confining one's thought. At such moments man has to seek some other ways inorder to escape chains of the language, and resorting to literature is considcres to be one such \Vay. Running away from the Jimitatios imposed by language, the poet or the author turns to literature to convey that part of his perception or emotions language failed to represent. In other words,making use of diffrent litrerary approaches and methals as well destray the manipulatiny the language prison making it possible to express the magniricant mental acuities . The grasp of literature ranges from the tiniest parts of language that is phones (consonants/vowels) to the full range of a literary work.
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
56
66
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6217_1d06c624141b7a57f5c4ad28df3a7896.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6217
The methods of Literary Criticism in "Tabaghato shoara ·· Mohammad Ebne Sanam Aljomahi
hasan
dadkhah
.
author
text
article
2000
per
Literary criticism , a branch of literature which deals with the description and assessment of literary works , has been traditionally associated with Arahic Literature. "The History of the Ancient Arabic Literature" is a book which is concerned with issues on literature and literary criticism. By writing a book called " Tahaghato Shoara" (The classification of poets) , Ebnc Sanam, one of the most famous Arab narrators and critics pioneered the tradition of literary criticism and recording the history of literature, in Arabic literature. His book includes the classitication methods and procedures, bibliographical information about poets and critical considerations and judgments of poems. The most important feature of this hook is its various methods or criticism of poems, some or which are as follows: a ) Comparing a poet with his contemporaries b ) Comparing a poet with other poets in his city, town , or region. C) Distinguishing a poet among other poets of a certain era. d ) Distinguishing a c ) Distinguishing a poet on the basis of his specific methods or analysis. f) Praising a poet for his pocuce talent. g) Choosing and distinguishing one of the poet "s odes. Although the abovementioned methods and procedures had been in use in classical Arabic literary criticism, some critics belonging to the eras following that of Ebncsalum and even some of our contcmporaris have made use of them as well poet among others in terms of his use of literary techniques and styles.
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
67
79
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6218_c12e520b25dffb3dc9eda4428f144c92.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6218
on sufism
mehdi
sharifian
.
author
text
article
2000
per
What is meant by "sufisrn" is not confined to the mere "practice of Love". In this school , life is understood to connote an air of "Love" and the universe is seen as the representation of "God". The mystic should have a cultivates mind and pure soul in order to absorb the waves of "Godly Love" Here , the soul is considered to he "the Home of God" whose tenant is like a mirror reilccung the "Truth" . and an image of "God". But the legacy of "sufism" is not "Love" and nothing else. This school is replete with variovs political, social , sociological issues and psychological considerations. As "suti" is living within the society , dealing with different walks of people from different professions, groups , religions antJ be sensitive to Jots of issvcs. He well kmows how disasterous the "Holy power" can be and what sorts of crimes hace been commited all through history in the nam of God. Al though he hawnot succeeded to eradicate or reduce injustice, at least he could introduce some rivals for the tyrants of the world called "PlR" and "REND" , the tyrants rule over bodies while the latter rule over souls. in this school , no room is left for greed , avarice , and mercenary , and every one is warned against yielding to materialistic world. He· has opened a window to a new horizen , that of giving service to and h.r,ing compassion for the people. Though "SUFI" has appreciation for science and knowledge , ther instrumental use he assvmes to be a hazard for society , like a very dangerous gun in a child.s hand. He expects science to uucct us towards humanity and modesty, and nothing else.
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
80
102
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6219_23147ba4d2055a9ac0c47eda9b82ab97.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6219
The notion of Translation in The past
rahman
moshtaghmehr
.
author
text
article
2000
per
what we understand hy literary trunslation today, is different in nature from that of the past. Readers at present time expect and believe a translator to be a means of transl'ering the meanings from the original text to the target text. Even in mere artistic and literary texts , translator is not allowed to do anything but pulling the content of the original text in the target forms and it-; nicitics are preserred.Howerer , in the most important literary translations in persian , translation has heen equated with text ernbelishmcnt , and the translators of these fexts frankly admit that they had embarked on translating in order to display their art , artistic taste , literary knowledge, and that the kind of text , its content , and ideas behind II had only secondly been taken in to account this article attempts to analyse the notion of translation in past through investigating the translated texts and mentioning their translators' insights.
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
103
113
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6220_02f494d66a9c31742b86381a8bf19ad7.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6220
The stance of Allam-EsOritkhoda in contemporary potry
mahmood
bashiri
.
author
text
article
2000
per
The present article a1temp1s to depict an image of "Allam-E-Dehkhida" as the pioneer of poetic innivation. some researchers of the contemporary literature and poe1ry, believe some other poets to he the pioneers of innovation in poetry , whose opinions we wovld consider with a uhsow of doubt. According fo the avthor , "Allam-E-Dehkhoda" had been the very first poet who had embarked on introducing a new form of poetry, one which has been borrowed and followdc by some contemporary poets.
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
114
122
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6221_4778abb46f35e205fcf9f373615f3c55.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6221
TAMSIL-E-AYNEH- "A Review on the poem of NAGHSH-E-BADII Ghazali Mashhadi
mostafa
musavi
.
author
text
article
2000
per
Ghazali madhhadi , a tenth century poet ,(solar year) is considered to be one of the famous poets during the time that king TAHMASB-E-SAFANI 11.,d been on the throne. He immigrated to India and was accepted in KtlANZAMAN AL! GHOLl KHAN and king AKBAR GOORKANl'S p.Jaccs, in the palace latter of the he was highly respected, given The label of MALEK-AL-SHOARA (master of the poets). He was born in 930 in nushhad and died in 980 in India. He was a "sufi" and had written some mrstical poems. His simple and lluent language is the most important feature ,ii his poetry. Besides his collection of poems consisting of a variety of poems in u.ffcrcnt styles, a lot of other poems are also known to be by him,among them
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
123
139
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6222_11228b756f0aff7133561e37151efbc5.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6222
An Lmage of SAAD/ in Distorted mirrors
kavus
hasanli
.
author
text
article
2000
per
The artistic works of the eminent and renowned artists in the past , reflects an image of their true disposition. Literary Works , Which arc the representations of those geal Moments of creativity can lead the wise reader to the inside world of their creators , though al limes , for different reasons some works are created which do not have much in common with their crators' real personality. these tricks however can be defected , through careful consideration. It is absolutely evident that you can express fair judgments over a writer's ideas if you have access to all his hiterary works. you can never rebuild a poet's mental fram work through briefly analysing only a part of his or her poems. More over , broad Knowledge and awareness , is the certain prcrcguisite for making fair judgments This article will auempt to analyse the judgments made about "SAAD!", the greut Iranian poet.
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
140
151
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6223_00be6a263bbcedb32357fc3cee23ab7e.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6223
IS there an article called Women's literature
bargardan
farahyeganeh
.
author
text
article
2000
per
There are so many literary texts.The sex or whose writer you can not tell. However in every culture , women's. lives and experiences differ from those of men in many respects , and the differences are retlected in their writings. It is usually useful to classify literary works into different groups in order to emphasize certain aspects of them. During recent years , it has been believed by a large number of people that analysing and criticizing women's works apart from men's can be beneficial , as some critical perspectives discussed in literature can not In past the literary works which were dealing with women , were to be read by women basically , while those related to men were believed to be suitable for both men and women. The very idea of confining womens' works to a limited number of readers remindus of the system of evaluation used in our culture to evaluate mens' experiences compared with womens'. yet this system is changing now and female writers are describing womens' lives , dreams , aims and occupations, in more detail male writers. In books written by men , female characters are mentiond and worked on basically in terms of their emotional and sexual relations with men. Thorgh considering their number, women are not in minority, their experiences and standards have been cosidered marginal in a lot of respects and those of men , the norms. moreorer, what is done by most of people is taken as important , yet private lives and feelings are less salient and limites to those involved. Most often the sort of literature dealing with general events is more seriovs and, at a higher status compared with that engaged with personal lives. thus , literature created hy or dealing with women has been either ignored or deprived of the worth it has really desprived. these evaluations are gradually being 2 uestiond and rejected .3
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
152
168
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6224_6383ef6d1620b13f9e9768b8f12e4591.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6224
The present study attempts to briefly depict the splendid era of BABATAHER-E-ORIAN
mohamadhosein
bayat
.
author
text
article
2000
per
1 - Introduction of BABATAHER and analysis of Erfan and in the fifth century; the latter itself is comprrisedof three sections: a) The concept of Erfan as well as the differences existing between Erfan and Sufism. b) Erfan a most private personal knowledge, intransferable to others. c) A perspective of "Ertan" and "sufism" in the second century along with some dicriptions. - Introduction of BABATAHER-E-ORIAN and a number of his This section, too, is comprised of l\VO sections: a) Introducing those who bclivcd in four eminent figures from this school and some of their most brilliant works. b) The author has contented himself to introducing four celebrities from this school. - General conclusion on the basis of mystical methods. This is divied into two parts: in part a some of the beliefs of the four mystics mentioned above arc pointdc out, analying the concept of piosity as well as the positive and the negative aspects of worship ans religious devotion. In part b some of the most glorious works of those four mystics who belong the same school arc pointed out. At the end a conclusion is provided concerning the pioneers of this school and the method they had adopted in their practice. Generally speaking, in this section the worldviews of these pioneers are introduced by referring to their works; attempts have been made to prove that these grest people saw nothing but God in the world. Attempts have also been made to prove their vicwpionts and hence their optimism and beliefs in existence
Literary Text Research
Allameh Tabataba’i University
2251-7138
3
v.
11
no.
2000
169
200
https://ltr.atu.ac.ir/article_6225_3c5b0afb1ee28f2889a229e2b25d85f8.pdf
dx.doi.org/10.22054/ltr.2000.6225